Simply put, Maine cannot afford four more years of Paul LePage.
As much as we may have come to believe that Maine Governor Paul LePage is unintelligent, inarticulate, misinformed, and misguided, it seems a stretch to believe he could be in league with a terrorist group that believes the United States Government is illegitimate, but it seems this is exactly the case. News stories breaking today show that from January to September, 2013, LePage met at least eight times with members of a group who call themselves Sovereign Citizens, a group that is recognized by the FBI and Maine state law enforcement as belonging to “a domestic terrorist movement.”
Paul LePage is a nutjob — and a dangerous one. Many have suspected it. Now we have the proof.
A Paul Krugman piece debunks the conservative myth (and LePage mantra) that we need to to give tax breaks to those hard-working job creators if our economy is ever to improve.
For any Rip Van Winkle’s out there, or for anyone wanting a quick review of the absurdity that is the LePage administration, Colin Woodard has a new article out in Politico, “How Did Mild-Mannered Maine Get America’s Craziest Governor? Paul LePage, Explained.”
Two recent opinion pieces provide important context for the recent release of a A to F grading system that the LePage administration is now using to stigmatize many public schools:
The governor’s plan in a nutshell is to shrink (if not eliminate) public education in Maine. The strategy:
(1) Repeatedly denigrate public schools in order to create a negative public opinion of schools. Done.
(2) Concoct a “grading system” that will, by design and regardless of their actual performance, grade a sizable percentage of Maine schools as “D” and “F.” Done.
(3) Support legislation that opens the door to charter schools and online learning corporations. Done.
(4) Starve public schools financially by diverting public funds from public schools to private and virtual schools. (In progress).
(5) Create widespread budget crises in Maine towns by eliminating revenue sharing. (In progress).
(5) Advocate for “school choice” and use #2 above to drive enrollment — and financial support — from certain schools (mostly schools serving our neediest students in economically depressed parts of the state) and toward corporate virtual schools and charter schools. (In progress).
The irony is that if LePage gets his way, “choice” for many Maine families will be diminished rather than enhanced. Many rural schools will shrink or close outright and parents will be faced with transporting their kids to distant schools, enrolling them in an for-profit virtual schools, or moving to another area of the state. Kids from poor families, who already have too few choices, will have fewer choices still.
A lengthy Colin Woodard article in today’s Portland Press Herald examines the current situation in which the LePage administration has halted all planning for climate change (and the intensified storms that are the result) and in which Democrats want to pass legislation that would require Maine to develop such plans.
Previously we have posted about the LePage administrations head-in-the-sand relationship with our environment here.
As reported in the BDN and Maine Sunday Telegram, Paul LePage spent part of Friday morning complaining to a captive audience of schoolkids that his greatest fear is of newspapers and that he is “not a fan of newspapers.”
Later, he stated to a reporter that newspapers “spin the news” rather than providing reporting that is “fair and objective.”
This follows comments from last March in which LePage said, also to students, “Reading newspapers in the state of Maine is like paying somebody to tell you lies.”
It’s interesting to note that the careers of Republicans such as Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins have not been likewise incapacitated by the alleged liberal bias of Maine newspapers.
Mr. “Fair and Balanced” (who not so long ago stated “If you want a good education, go to a private school,”) also said that private schools such as the one he spoke at Friday were “showing the rest of the people in Maine that you’re getting the best education, and every child in Maine deserves to have the same good education that you’re all getting.”
Meanwhile, this week’s news about charter schools, the holy grail by which LePage hopes to transform education in this state, is not particularly rosy. A New York Times article provides further evidence that overall, despite their costs, charter schools have failed to provide promised benefits. A Washington Post article details the mounting evidence on how online learning corporations are being let in through back doors to write state legislation that subsequently opens the front doors to corporate profits.
Paul LePage doesn’t want you to read that stuff, however. Just tune in to his weekly Saturday morning radio address and he will tell you all that you need to know.
Received this petition via email today. Please sign and pass it on if you agree that our system should ensure candidates for legislature and governor are not elected “by accident,” but rather have the support of the majority of Maine people. The city of Portland is already using ranked choice voting.
“Maine politicians should be elected with a majority vote. Please join me in supporting Rep. Diane Russell’s bill to elect the Governor and Legislature with Ranked Choice Voting (AKA Instant Runoff Voting). Her bill encourages voter choice while avoiding “spoiler” candidates.”
If you agree and wish to sign the petition, please click here.:
Edgar Allen Beam’s recent opinion piece on ranked choice voting is here.
The self-proclaimed signature accomplishment of the LePage administration has been the $433 million tax cut, which Paul LePage has often defended by stating it is a “tax cut for the poor.”
When challenged on his tax cuts, LePage is quick to bring up the 70,000 Maine residents who no longer pay state income tax due to legislation enacted in the last two years..
Thanks to figures from the Maine Center for Economic Policy, we now have a more clear picture of how much life has improved for those 70,000. Let’s imagine a twenty-something single female working 35 hours a week at minimum wage. Thanks to the LePage tax cut, she now has a grand total of — get this — $7.00 per year of additional spending money. Seven dollars. Per year. According to MHPC, those earning twice as much only benefit to the tune of $50.00 per year. That’s one dollar per week.
Don’t spend it all at once.
The point is that the members of that nameless, faceless 70,000 were paying almost nothing in taxes to begin with.
So LePage has cut health insurance benefits, prescription benefits, and child care benefits for these folks, but hey, they have that extra $7.00 in their pockets, so they should be thankful, right?
The LePage administration tax cut for the poor is a first class farce — and nothing more.
To read more, please see Joel Johnson’s recent BDN opinion piece, “Maine’s Avoidable Budget Crisis.”.